Assessment first, exercise second
The most common mistake I see in practice is a list of exercises handed out without an assessment. Giving the same programme to two people who both say “I can't get enough air” is like prescribing the same medicine for two different conditions. Most of the first appointment is therefore spent talking, observing and measuring.
I do not claim to improve what I have not measured
I believe progress should not stop at “I feel better”. Where appropriate I use respiratory muscle strength measurement, breathlessness and fatigue scales, and sit-to-stand and walking-based functional tests. That way we can both see whether the programme is working and keep the intensity at the right point.
An honest frame
I do not promise a definitive result, a timeframe or a “permanent solution”. Respiratory physiotherapy does not remove chronic lung disease, and no technique replaces the treatment your doctor has planned. What I can do is build a measurable programme aimed at helping you do more in daily life with the capacity you have.
People who understand what they are doing keep going
I share assessment findings with the person in front of me: what each result means and why we chose a particular technique. The clearest lesson of thirty years is this — someone who understands the logic of their exercise sustains the programme.
Knowing the limits
If something requiring medical review emerges during assessment — breathlessness at rest, blood in sputum, unexplained weight loss, new chest pain — the programme is postponed and the person is referred. That is not a delay; it is doing things in the right order.